Photo No No
I just got back from the Port of Long Beach where I taking pictures for my photography class. After a few minutes there, some police rolled by and I was detained for taking photographs. Supposedly, since 9/11, you
I just got back from the Port of Long Beach where I taking pictures for my photography class. After a few minutes there, some police rolled by and I was detained for taking photographs. Supposedly, since 9/11, you
I think you’ll get some understanding under those circumstances. Interestingly enough, I was just reading about this type of situation earlier tonight. Take a look at this post on Urban Vancouver and the links from there.
Film confiscation is a risky move.
http://www.krages.com/ThePhotographersRight.pdf
Sometimes agents acting for entities
such as owners of industrial plants
and shopping malls may ask you to
hand over your film. Absent a court
order, private parties have no right to
confiscate your film. Taking your film
directly or indirectly by threatening to
use force or call a law enforcement
agency can constitute criminal offenses
such as theft and coercion. It can
likewise constitute a civil tort such as
conversion. Law enforcement officers
may have the authority to seize film
when making an arrest but otherwise
must obtain a court order.
I second Travis’s point – Especially if there aren’t any signs.
That said, not everyone wants to make a case out of it, and go though an arrest and lawsuit to show you’re right. It’s a tought line to cross – you want to do what’s right, but some things are better fought when you’re out of the situation.
We had the same problem up here in Portland. Turns out no such law, comanment or any other such nonsense has ever been issued by the department of jack booted… oops I mean Homeland defence. They had no right what so ever to take your film.